Posted from Diigo.
Tag: Google
-
Google Books just won a decade-long copyright fight – The Washington Post
“The legal fight over Google’s effort to create a digital library of millions of book is finally over”.
Posted from Diigo.
“Google’s copying is fair use under 17 U.S.C. §107 and is therefore not infringing.
The Court of Appeals concludes that the defendant’s copying is transformative within the meaning of Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc., 510 U.S. 569, 10 578-585 (1994), does not offer the public a meaningful substitute for matter protected by the plaintiffs’ copyrights, and satisfies § 107’s test for fair use.”
Court of Appeal ruling here.
Confirming the District Court decision that you can find here.
-
Google, Twitter Work on Open Source ‘Instant Articles’ for Mobile | Re/code
“The plan, which is supposed to launch with a small group of publishers this fall, is an effort to make it easier for publishers to distribute their stuff on mobile devices. It is also a response to similar pushes from Facebook, Apple and Snapchat.”
Posted from Diigo.
-
European Publishers Play Lobbying Role Against Google – The New York Times
“The argument is simple enough: Publishers want money from Google,” said Till Kreutzer, a German lawyer who has campaigned against these new copyright proposals. “Many European politicians are open to listening to that type of proposal.”
Posted from Diigo.
- “Although the company has granted some of the requests, delisting was only carried out on European extensions of the search engine and not when searches are made from “google.com” or other non-European extensions.
In accordance with the CJEU judgement, the CNIL considers that in order to be effective, delisting must be carried out on all extensions of the search engine and that the service provided by Google search constitutes a single processing”.
Posted from Diigo.
-
Open Letter to Google From 80 Internet Scholars: Release RTBF Compliance Data — Medium
-
“What We Seek
-
Aggregate data about how Google is responding to the >250,000 requests to delist links thought to contravene data protection from name search results. We should know if the anecdotal evidence of Google’s process is representative: What sort of information typically gets delisted (e.g., personal health) and what sort typically does not (e.g., about a public figure), in what proportions and in what countries?”
-
Posted from Diigo.
